var obj =[new Array(1)].map(x=>({id:x,name:x}));
for (var key in obj) {
console.log(obj[key].id);
}
Object.keys(obj).forEach(key => console.log(obj[key].id));
Object.values(obj).forEach(n => console.log(n.id));
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
for-in | |
Object.keys | |
Object.values |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
for-in | 353032.8 Ops/sec |
Object.keys | 299727.0 Ops/sec |
Object.values | 305775.5 Ops/sec |
Let's dive into the explanation of the provided JavaScript microbenchmark.
What is tested?
The benchmark tests three different approaches to iterate over an object in JavaScript:
for...in
statement to iterate over the object's properties (including inherited ones). It accesses each property using its key.Options comparison
The three approaches have different characteristics that affect their performance:
Pros and cons of each approach
Library usage
There is no library explicitly mentioned in the provided benchmark definition. However, if you're using libraries like Lodash or others for iterating over objects, it's essential to be aware of their performance implications and choose the most efficient approach accordingly.
Special JavaScript features/syntax
The benchmark defines modern JavaScript syntax (e.g., arrow functions (=>
), template literals (\r\n
)) that may not work in older browsers or environments. If you need compatibility with older browsers, consider transpiling your code to support these features or using polyfills.
Other alternatives
If you're concerned about performance differences between the three approaches:
In conclusion, the benchmark provides insight into the performance differences between for-in loop, Object.keys(), and Object.values() methods when iterating over objects in JavaScript. Choosing the most efficient approach depends on your specific use case, target browser support, and personal preference.