<script src="//ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jquery/3.1.1/jquery.min.js"></script>
<div id="nhngodo">Hi! NHNgodo!</div>
let el = document.getElementById("nhngodo");
el.classList.add('random-class');
el.classList.remove('random-class');
let $el = $("#nhngodo");
$el.addClass('random-class');
$el.removeClass('random-class');
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
Vanilla JS add class | |
Jquery |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
Vanilla JS add class | 1936733.1 Ops/sec |
Jquery | 740325.8 Ops/sec |
Overview of the Benchmark
The provided JSON represents a JavaScript microbenchmarking test case on MeasureThat.net. The test measures the performance difference between using vanilla JavaScript and jQuery to add and remove classes from an HTML element.
What is being tested?
Two specific options are being compared:
addClass
and removeClass
methods to achieve the same functionality.Pros and Cons of each approach:
document.querySelector
and classList
manipulation.Library: jQuery
jQuery is a popular JavaScript library that simplifies DOM manipulation and event handling. In this benchmark, it is used to add and remove classes from an element using its addClass
and removeClass
methods. jQuery provides a convenient API for class management, which can simplify code and improve performance by leveraging optimizations and caching.
Special JS feature: None
There are no special JavaScript features or syntaxes mentioned in the benchmark definition or test cases.
Alternatives to vanilla JS and jQuery:
For this specific use case, other alternatives could be:
className
prop.However, for this specific benchmark, the focus is on comparing vanilla JS and jQuery implementations, making these alternatives less relevant.