var result;
for (let i = 0; i < 30000; i++) {
const num = Math.floor(Math.random() * 1000);
result = (num % 2 && 2) || 1;
}
return result;
var result;
for (let i = 0; i < 30000; i++) {
const num = Math.floor(Math.random() * 1000);
result = num % 2 ? 2 : 1;
}
return result;
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
LOGICAL approach | |
TERNARY approach |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
LOGICAL approach | 948.9 Ops/sec |
TERNARY approach | 915.5 Ops/sec |
Let's break down the provided benchmark and explain what is being tested, the different approaches compared, their pros and cons, and other considerations.
What is being tested:
The provided benchmark tests the performance of two different approaches to perform an assignment operation:
LOGICAL approach
): This approach uses a logical AND operator &&
to assign a value to a variable based on a condition.TERNARY approach
): This approach uses a ternary operator ?
and colon :
to perform the same assignment operation.Options compared:
The two approaches are being compared in terms of their performance, which is measured by the number of executions per second.
Pros and Cons of each approach:
LOGICAL approach
):TERNARY approach
):Library and syntax used:
The provided benchmark code uses the following:
Math.floor(Math.random() * 1000)
to generate a random number between 0 and 999.&&
and its assignment equivalent 2 && 2
.?
and colon :
.Other considerations:
Alternative approaches:
Other approaches to compare in this benchmark might include:
if
statements instead of logical operators for assignment.switch
statements instead of ternary operators for simple assignment operations.Function.prototype.call()
method.Keep in mind that these alternative approaches would likely require significant changes to the benchmark code and may not be relevant to typical use cases.