Benchmark: Math.max() vs for..if

Script Preparation code:

var viewList = [];
var randomIds = [ 279, 272, 402, 180, 152, 418, 18, 27, 351, 3 ]

for (var i = 0; i < 10; ++i) {
  viewList.push({ value: {viewId: randomIds[i]}});
}

Tests:

Math.max()
return Math.max(...viewList.map(view => view.value.viewId));
for..if
var largestId = 0; for (var view of viewList) { if (view.value.viewId > largestId) { largestId = view.value.viewId; } } return largestId;

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
Math.max()
for..if

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

ⓘ Get performance results from real users on your website with Request Metrics.

Website Performance Monitoring by Request Metrics

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: one year ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/110.0.0.0 Safari/537.36

Browser/OS: Chrome 110 on Windows

View result in a separate tab

Test name	Executions per second
Math.max()	4915018.0 Ops/sec
for..if	15127450.0 Ops/sec

Math.max() vs for..if (version: 0)

Comparing performance of: Math.max() vs for..if

Created: one year ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

Math.max()

for..if

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Experimental features:

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A