const a = {
A: 'a',
B: 'b',
C: 'c',
D: 'd',
E: 'e',
F: 'f',
G: 'g',
H: 'h',
I: 'i',
J: 'j',
K: 'k',
L: 'l',
M: 'm',
}
const b = {
A: 'n',
B: 'o',
C: 'p',
D: 'q',
E: 'r',
F: 's',
G: 't',
H: 'u',
I: 'v',
J: 'w',
K: 'x',
L: 'y',
M: 'z',
}
Object.assign(a, b);
const a = {
A: 'a',
B: 'b',
C: 'c',
D: 'd',
E: 'e',
F: 'f',
G: 'g',
H: 'h',
I: 'i',
J: 'j',
K: 'k',
L: 'l',
M: 'm',
}
const b = {
A: 'n',
B: 'o',
C: 'p',
D: 'q',
E: 'r',
F: 's',
G: 't',
H: 'u',
I: 'v',
J: 'w',
K: 'x',
L: 'y',
M: 'z',
}
for (let prop in b)
a[prop] = b[prop];
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
Object.assign | |
for in loop |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
Object.assign | 3378279.0 Ops/sec |
for in loop | 5165994.0 Ops/sec |
Let's break down the benchmark and explain what's being tested, compared, and their pros and cons.
Benchmark Definition
The benchmark is testing two approaches to merge two objects in JavaScript: Object.assign
and a for-in loop with object assignment.
Options Compared
b
) and assigns each property value to the corresponding key in another object (a
).Pros and Cons
Library/Features Used
In this benchmark, there is no explicit library or feature used. The focus is on comparing two different approaches to merge objects in JavaScript.
Special JS Features/Syntax
None mentioned in the provided JSON.
Other Alternatives
If you want to test other approaches to merge objects, here are a few alternatives:
Array.prototype.reduce()
: This method can be used to merge objects by reducing an array of key-value pairs into the target object.Object.keys()
and forEach()
: This approach involves iterating over the keys of one object using Object.keys()
and assigning each value to the corresponding key in another object using a callback function with forEach()
.Keep in mind that these alternatives may have different performance characteristics, code readability, and error handling compared to Object.assign
and the for-in loop approach.