const firstObject = { a: 0, b: 0 }
const secondObject = { a: 1, b: 1 }
const finalObject = {
firstObject,
secondObject
};
const firstObject = { a: 0, b: 0 }
const secondObject = { a: 1, b: 1 }
const finalObject = Object.assign(firstObject, secondObject);
let firstObject = { a: 0, b: 0 }
const secondObject = { a: 1, b: 1 }
finalObject = { a: secondObject.a, b: secondObject.b };
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
Using the spread operator | |
Using Object.assign | |
Assigning directly |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
Using the spread operator | 33848760.0 Ops/sec |
Using Object.assign | 12061515.0 Ops/sec |
Assigning directly | 12433881.0 Ops/sec |
Let's dive into the world of JavaScript microbenchmarks on MeasureThat.net.
Benchmark Overview
The provided benchmark measures the performance of three different approaches to merge two objects in JavaScript:
...
) to merge objects.Object.assign()
method to merge objects.Options Compared
The benchmark compares the performance of these three approaches on a simple object merge scenario, where two objects are merged into one. The order of operations is as follows:
firstObject
and secondObject
.finalObject
.Pros and Cons
Here's a brief summary of the pros and cons of each approach:
...
):Library and Special JS Features
There are no libraries or special JavaScript features used in this benchmark. The focus is solely on comparing the performance of these three basic object merge strategies.
Other Considerations
Keep in mind that:
Alternatives
If you're interested in exploring alternative approaches for object merge, consider using:
I hope this explanation helps you understand the benchmark results!