var array = [0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9];
var output = array.slice();
var array = [0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9];
var output = Object.assign([], array);
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
splice | |
Object.assign |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
splice | 131026072.0 Ops/sec |
Object.assign | 498734.5 Ops/sec |
Let's dive into the world of MeasureThat.net and explore what's tested in this benchmark.
Benchmark Definition
The provided JSON represents a JavaScript microbenchmarking test case. The Benchmark Definition
section defines the basic setup for the test, including:
var array = [0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9];
) that creates an array of numbers.Individual Test Cases
The benchmark consists of two individual test cases:
slice()
method to create a copy of the original array.Object.assign()
method to create a shallow copy of the original array.What's being compared?
In this benchmark, two approaches are being compared:
splice()
: A method that creates a new array by copying elements from the original array and returns the new array.Object.assign()
: A method that takes an existing object and copies all enumerable own properties from one or more source objects into a new target object.Pros and Cons of each approach
Object.assign()
for small arrays.splice()
. Also, it's often faster for large arrays.Library and purpose
There is no explicit library mentioned in this benchmark. However, Object.assign()
uses the W3C standard method for assigning properties from one or more source objects to a target object.
Special JS feature or syntax
None are explicitly mentioned in this benchmark.
Other alternatives
For creating an array copy, other approaches could be:
Array.prototype.slice.call()
: Similar to splice()
, but creates a new array using the slice()
method on an existing array.Array.from()
: Creates a new array from an iterable source, such as another array or an array-like object.Conclusion
In this benchmark, two approaches are compared: splice()
and Object.assign()
. The choice between these methods depends on the specific requirements of your use case. If you need to create a shallow copy of a small array for faster execution, Object.assign()
might be the better choice. However, if memory usage is not a concern, and you want to avoid creating unnecessary objects, splice()
could be a better option.
Keep in mind that this benchmark only tests these two approaches on arrays. Other types of data structures or use cases might require different methods for performance optimization.