var person = {name: 'Frederick', lastName: 'Corcino Alejo'};
_.has(person, 'name');
Object.hasOwnProperty.bind(person)('name')
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
_has | |
hasOwnProperty.bind |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
_has | 9193405.0 Ops/sec |
hasOwnProperty.bind | 5943358.0 Ops/sec |
I'd be happy to explain the benchmark and its test cases.
What is being tested?
The provided JSON represents a JavaScript microbenchmark, specifically comparing two approaches for checking if an object has a certain property: _.has
from Lodash and the hasOwnProperty.bind
method.
Approaches compared:
hasOwnProperty.bind
method: This is a method on the Object
prototype that checks if an object has a certain property, just like _.has
. The bind
part means that this specific version of the method is being called with a particular context (in this case, the person
object).Pros and Cons:
hasOwnProperty.bind
method:_.has
.bind
to achieve the desired behavior, which can add complexity.In general, the hasOwnProperty.bind
method is considered a good default choice for property checks, as it's lightweight and optimized. However, if readability or explicitness is more important, _.has
might be preferred.
Library:
The Lodash library is used in this benchmark, which provides various utility functions, including _.has. Lodash aims to provide a consistent and predictable API for common tasks, making code more readable and maintainable.
Special JS feature or syntax:
There's no specific JavaScript feature or syntax being tested here. The focus is on the implementation details of property checks in JavaScript.
Other alternatives:
In general, other ways to check if an object has a certain property might include:
in
operator (e.g., person['name'] in person
)for...in
loop (e.g., for (var key in person) { ... }
)However, these alternatives are less common and often less efficient than the built-in methods like hasOwnProperty.bind
.