Benchmark: Concat vs forEach 1112222333345

Script Preparation code:

var a = [ 
		"id", "workspaceId", "name", "description", "snippet", "iconEmoji", "iconImage", "relationFormat", "type", "layout", "isHidden", "isArchived", 
		"isReadonly", "isDeleted", "isFavorite", "done", "fileExt", "fileMimeType", "sizeInBytes", "restrictions"
	];

Tests:

concat 1111222233334
[].concat(a);
forEach 1111222233334
var set = new Set(); a.forEach(key => set.add(key));

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
concat 1111222233334
forEach 1111222233334

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

ⓘ Get performance results from real users on your website with Request Metrics.

Website Performance Monitoring by Request Metrics

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: one year ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_15_7) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/109.0.0.0 Safari/537.36

Browser/OS: Chrome 109 on Mac OS X 10.15.7

View result in a separate tab

Test name	Executions per second
concat 1111222233334	11390120.0 Ops/sec
forEach 1111222233334	1060136.0 Ops/sec

Concat vs forEach 1112222333345 (version: 0)

Comparing performance of: concat 1111222233334 vs forEach 1111222233334

Created: one year ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

concat 1111222233334

forEach 1111222233334

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Experimental features:

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A