url1 = 'abc.com';
url2 = 'abc.com/';
url3 = 'abc.com///';
regex3 = new RegExp('\/+$');
sanitizeUrl1 = function(url) {
return url.replace(/\/+$/, '');
}
sanitizeUrl2 = function(url) {
return url.replace(/[/]+$/, '');
}
sanitizeUrl3 = function(url) {
return url.replace(regex3, '');
}
sanitizeUrl1(url1);
sanitizeUrl1(url2);
sanitizeUrl1(url3);
sanitizeUrl2(url1);
sanitizeUrl2(url2);
sanitizeUrl2(url3);
sanitizeUrl3(url1);
sanitizeUrl3(url2);
sanitizeUrl3(url3);
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
regex character | |
regex character group | |
Compiled regex |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
regex character | 639528.6 Ops/sec |
regex character group | 610928.7 Ops/sec |
Compiled regex | 481836.2 Ops/sec |
Let's break down the provided benchmark definition and test cases.
Benchmark Definition JSON
The JSON represents a JavaScript microbenchmark that tests three different approaches to sanitizing URLs:
sanitizeUrl1
: Uses regular expressions with forward slashes (/
) as separators. The regular expression is defined in the "Script Preparation Code" section.sanitizeUrl2
: Uses character groups ( [ ]
) as separators.sanitizeUrl3
: Uses a compiled regular expression, which is likely created by the JavaScript engine itself.Options Compared
The benchmark compares the performance of these three approaches:
sanitizeUrl1
sanitizeUrl2
sanitizeUrl3
Pros and Cons
Here's a brief summary of each approach:
/
):[ ]
):The benchmark likely aims to determine which approach is the fastest in terms of execution speed for URL sanitization.
Library and Purpose
There is no explicit library mentioned in the benchmark definition. However, regular expressions are a built-in feature of JavaScript, making them widely available.
Special JS Features or Syntax
None are explicitly mentioned.
Other Considerations
When running this benchmark, it's essential to consider factors like:
Alternative Approaches
Some alternative approaches to URL sanitization could be explored:
url-regex
or sanitize-url
.\s
) instead of forward slashes.Keep in mind that these alternatives may not provide significant performance improvements over the benchmarked approaches and might require additional development effort.