var a = Array.from({length:500},(v,k)=>k+1)
var b = Object.assign({}, a.map((x) => ({[x]: true})));
return a.includes(9)
return b[9]
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
includes | |
lookup |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
includes | 33861656.0 Ops/sec |
lookup | 57631748.0 Ops/sec |
I'd be happy to help you understand the provided benchmark.
What is being tested?
The benchmark is comparing two approaches:
array.includes()
for checking if an element exists in an array ("includes"
test case)."lookup"
test case).Options compared:
The benchmark is comparing the performance of these two approaches when searching for a specific value (in this case, the number 9) in large arrays and objects.
Pros and Cons of each approach:
array.includes()
: This method checks if the specified element exists in the array by iterating through it from start to end. It's relatively simple and straightforward."lookup"
test case): This method directly accesses the property on the object using its key (in this case, [9]
).Library usage:
There is no explicit library mentioned in the provided benchmark. However, it's worth noting that Array.from()
and Object.assign()
are built-in JavaScript methods, which might be optimized under the hood by modern browsers.
Special JS features or syntax:
The benchmark uses the following special feature:
let
constants (e.g., var a = Array.from({length:500},(v,k)=>k+1)
): This is a new way to declare variables in JavaScript, introduced in ECMAScript 2015. It allows for constant declarations that are scoped to the block or function.Other alternatives:
If you were to reimplement this benchmark using different approaches, some alternative options could be:
for...of
loop with find()
method on arrays.Object.keys()
and indexing into an object property by its key index.However, without seeing the benchmark code, it's difficult to recommend alternative approaches that would yield similar results.