<script src='https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/lodash.js/4.17.5/lodash.min.js'></script>
var x = 'this'
var y = _.isString(x)
var y = (typeof(x) === 'string')
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
lodash | |
typeof |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
lodash | 64313268.0 Ops/sec |
typeof | 71263832.0 Ops/sec |
I'd be happy to explain the benchmark and its results.
What is being tested?
The benchmark is testing two different approaches to check if a string exists in JavaScript:
_.isString(x)
from the Lodash library(typeof x === 'string')
Options compared:
In this case, we have only two options being compared: using the _.isString()
method from Lodash and using the typeof
operator with a string comparison.
Pros and Cons of each approach:
typeof
operator to get the type of the value, and then comparing it to 'string'
. While this method is straightforward, it can be slower than Lodash's method due to the overhead of the typeof
operator.Pros of Lodash's _.isString():
Cons of Lodash's _.isString():
Pros of typeof operator with string comparison:
Cons of typeof operator with string comparison:
Library used in the benchmark:
The _.isString()
method is from the Lodash library, which provides a set of utility functions for functional programming.
Special JS feature or syntax:
None are mentioned in this benchmark. However, if we were to add more test cases, we might see features like arrow functions, template literals, or newer language features.
Other alternatives:
If you need to check if a value is a string without using Lodash, you can also use the instanceof
operator or create your own custom function. For example:
function isString(x) {
return x instanceof String;
}
Alternatively, you could use the toString()
method on the value and then check if it equals 'string'
.