var array = new Array(1000000).fill(0);
function getObj() {
return {x: 0, Y: 0};
}
for (const i in array) array[i] = getObj();
let i;
for (i in array) array[i] = getObj();
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
3 | |
4 |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
3 | 5.0 Ops/sec |
4 | 4.9 Ops/sec |
Let's break down the benchmark definition and test cases to understand what is being tested.
Benchmark Definition
The benchmark definition is in JSON format and provides information about the script preparation code, which is:
var array = new Array(1000000).fill(0);
function getObj() {
return {x: 0, Y: 0};
}
This code creates an array of 1 million elements, filled with zeros. It then defines a function getObj
that returns an object with properties x
and Y
, both initialized to zero.
Test Cases
There are two test cases:
for...in
loop to iterate over the array elements, assigning the result of calling getObj()
to each element.for (const i in array) array[i] = getObj();
i
declared outside the loop, which shadows the in
operator's behavior and allows us to use the value of i
instead of the property name as the index.let i;
for (i in array) array[i] = getObj();
What is being tested?
The benchmark is testing two approaches to iterating over an array:
for...in
loop, where the variable i
takes on the property names of the array.i
outside the loop, which shadows the in
operator's behavior.Pros and Cons:
Traditional for...in
loop (Test Case 3)
Pros:
Cons:
Variable i
outside the loop (Test Case 4)
Pros:
Cons:
Library usage
There is no explicit library mentioned in the benchmark definition. However, the use of for...in
loop and variable shadowing suggests that the test might be targeting modern JavaScript engines.
Special JS features or syntax
The benchmark does not appear to use any special JavaScript features or syntax, such as async/await, promises, or es6+ syntax.
Other alternatives
Other approaches to iterating over arrays could include:
forEach
method: array.forEach((element) => getObj());
for
loop with an index variable: let i = 0; for (; i < array.length; i++) array[i] = getObj();
These alternatives would likely have similar performance characteristics to the traditional for...in
loop and variable shadowing approach, but might be slightly faster or more efficient due to the reduced overhead of property iteration.