var luckyNumber = Math.round(Math.random() * 100);
var uluckyNumber = Math.round(Math.random() * 100);
var anotherNumber = Math.round(Math.random() * 100);
`your lucky number for today is: ${luckyNumber} and unlucky number: ${uluckyNumber} and just another number : ${anotherNumber}`
'your lucky number for today is: ' + luckyNumber + ' and unlucky number: ' + uluckyNumber + ' and just another number : ' + anotherNumber
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
string-interpolation | |
string-concatenation |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
string-interpolation | 3506814.0 Ops/sec |
string-concatenation | 3392221.5 Ops/sec |
I'll explain the provided benchmark and its options.
Benchmark Overview
The provided benchmark measures the performance difference between two approaches to string concatenation in JavaScript: template literals (interpolation) and traditional string concatenation using the +
operator.
Options Compared
Two test cases are compared:
${}
) are used to create strings. This approach is more readable and concise, but its performance might be affected by the complexity of the expression.+
operator is used to create strings.Pros and Cons
Library and Special JS Feature
There is no library used in this benchmark, but it does utilize a special JavaScript feature: Template Literals (String Interpolation). Template literals were introduced in ECMAScript 2015 (ES6) and have become a standard feature in modern JavaScript.
Other Considerations
When writing string concatenation code, it's essential to consider the following:
+
operator or template literals instead of +=
or other string manipulation methods.String.fromCharCode()
or other low-level string creation methods, as they can be slower and less efficient than modern string concatenation approaches.Alternatives
If you need to measure performance for different string concatenation approaches, consider the following alternatives:
template
function, which provides a more readable way to create strings using template literals.Keep in mind that the best approach depends on your specific use case and performance requirements.