Let's dive into the world of JavaScript microbenchmarks on MeasureThat.net.

The provided benchmark compares two approaches to find elements that are not in an array using Lodash and the native filter() method with includes(). We'll break down what's being tested, the pros and cons of each approach, and discuss other alternatives.

What is being tested?

Three individual test cases are compared:

1. Lodash: Using the difference() function from Lodash to find elements that are not in arr2.
2. Native Filter with Includes: Using the native filter() method with a callback function that checks if an element is not included in arr1 using includes().
3. Set & Filter (Lodash): Using Lodash's difference() function to find elements that are not in arr2, but this time, first converting both arrays to sets.
4. Set & Filter (Native Filter with Includes): Similar to the previous point, using native filter() method with a callback function that checks if an element is not included in arr1 using includes(), and then converting both arrays to sets.

Options compared

The benchmark compares two main approaches:

• Lodash: Using Lodash's built-in functions for array manipulation.
• Native Filter with Includes: Using native JavaScript methods for filtering and checking inclusion.

Each approach has its pros and cons:

• Lodash:
  • Pros:
    • Generally faster than native methods, especially for larger arrays.
    • Easier to read and maintain due to the abstraction provided by Lodash's functions.
  • Cons:
    • Additional dependency on Lodash library, which may not be included in all environments.
    • May have slower startup times due to the loading of Lodash.
• Native Filter with Includes:
  • Pros:
    • No additional dependencies or overhead.
    • Can be faster for smaller arrays or when performance is critical.
  • Cons:
    • More verbose and harder to read, especially for complex filtering scenarios.
    • May be slower for larger arrays due to the use of includes() method.

Library: Lodash

Lodash is a popular JavaScript library that provides a set of high-level functions for working with arrays, objects, and more. The difference() function used in this benchmark is part of Lodash's utility functions, which makes it easier to perform array operations without having to write custom code.

Special JS feature: None

There are no special JavaScript features or syntax used in these benchmarks. They rely solely on standard JavaScript methods and Lodash functions.

Other alternatives

If you're interested in exploring alternative approaches, here are a few options:

• Native Set Operations: You can use native set operations (e.g., Set.prototype.filter(), Set.prototype.has()) to achieve similar results without Lodash.
• Tail-Binding: Some modern JavaScript engines support tail-bounding, which can improve performance for certain array manipulation scenarios.
• SIMD Instructions: If you're targeting a specific platform or hardware architecture that supports SIMD instructions (e.g., SSE, AVX), you might be able to optimize your code for better performance.

Keep in mind that these alternatives may have different trade-offs in terms of readability, maintainability, and platform support.