Benchmark: Obj to Array - MeasureThat.net

HTML Preparation code:

<script src="//cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/lodash.js/4.17.4/lodash.min.js"></script>

Script Preparation code:

var inputObj = {
  a: 'foo',
  b: [1, 2, 3],
  c: null,
  z: 55
};

Tests:

toArray()
var arr = _.toArray(inputObj);
values()
var arr = _.values(inputObj);
for in
var i = 0, arr = []; for (var ob in inputObj) arr[i++] = ob;

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
toArray()
values()
for in

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: 2025 years ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; Win64; x64; rv:58.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/58.0

Browser/OS: Firefox 58 on Windows 8.1

View result in a separate tab

Test name	Executions per second
toArray()	1069858.8 Ops/sec
values()	839403.4 Ops/sec
for in	12552443.0 Ops/sec

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated 2 months ago):

LLMs can make mistakes. Check important info.

Let's dive into the world of JavaScript microbenchmarks!

**Benchmark Definition**

The provided JSON represents a benchmark definition, which is a collection of test cases designed to measure the performance of different JavaScript code snippets.

Here's what we're testing:

* **Obj to Array**: We have three test cases that compare different approaches to convert an object (`inputObj`) into an array:
	+ `toArray()`: uses the `_` library's `toArray()` function
	+ `for in`: a simple manual loop using a `for...in` loop
	+ `values()`: uses the `_` library's `values()` function (more on this later)
* **Values**: We have two test cases that compare different approaches to extract values from an object:
	+ `values()`: uses the `_` library's `values()` function (same as above, but with a different usage pattern)
	+ Another manual loop using a `for...in` loop

**Options Compared**

We're comparing three options:

* **Lodash**: the `_` library provides two functions: `toArray()` and `values()`, which are used in the test cases. Lodash is a popular utility library for JavaScript that provides functional programming tools.
* **Manual Loop**: we have two test cases that use manual loops (`for...in` loop) to convert objects into arrays or extract values.

**Pros and Cons**

Here's a brief summary of the pros and cons of each approach:

* **Lodash**:
	+ Pros: concise and efficient code, often used in industry-standard libraries and frameworks
	+ Cons: requires an additional library import, might not be familiar to all developers
* **Manual Loop**:
	+ Pros: no external dependencies required, easy to understand and implement
	+ Cons: can be verbose and error-prone, may not be as efficient as the Lodash approach

**Other Considerations**

When writing microbenchmarks like this one, it's essential to consider factors such as:

* **Input size**: we're dealing with a relatively small input object (`inputObj`). If we were testing larger datasets, the performance differences might be more pronounced.
* **Hardware and OS**: the benchmark runs on Firefox 58 on Windows 8.1, which is an older browser version. This might affect the results if we were to run this benchmark on newer browsers or platforms.

**Special JS Feature/Syntax**

There's no special JavaScript feature or syntax used in these benchmarks, apart from the `_` library, which is a utility library that provides functional programming tools.

Now, let's talk about some alternative approaches:

* **Other libraries**: instead of Lodash, we could use other utility libraries like Moment.js, Underscore.js, or even Vanilla JavaScript implementations.
* **Different loop types**: we could also test using different loop constructs, such as `for...of`, `while` loops, or even recursive functions.
* **Async code**: if the input object contained asynchronous data (e.g., promises), we might want to add tests for async code.

Feel free to ask me any further questions or discuss specific aspects of this benchmark!

Related benchmarks:

Obj to Array (version: 0)

Comparing performance of: toArray() vs values() vs for in

Created: 6 years ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

toArray()

values()

for in

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Experimental features:

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated 2 months ago):