const firstArr = new Array(200).fill(undefined).map((val, i) => `item${i}`)
const secondArr = new Array(250).fill(undefined).map((val, i) => `item${i}`)
const result = secondArr.reduce(
(acc, item) => {
return acc.includes(item) ? acc : [acc, item]
},
[firstArr]
)
const firstArr = new Array(200).fill(undefined).map((val, i) => `item${i}`)
const secondArr = new Array(250).fill(undefined).map((val, i) => `item${i}`)
const result = []
for (let i = 0; i < firstArr.length; i++) {
if (result.indexOf(firstArr[i]) == -1) result.push(firstArr[i])
}
for (let i = 0; i < secondArr.length; i++) {
if (result.indexOf(secondArr[i]) == -1) result.push(secondArr[i])
}
const firstArr = new Array(200).fill(undefined).map((val, i) => `item${i}`)
const secondArr = new Array(250).fill(undefined).map((val, i) => `item${i}`)
const concatArr = firstArr.concat(secondArr)
const result = concatArr.filter((item, idx) => concatArr.indexOf(item) === idx)
const firstArr = new Array(200).fill(undefined).map((val, i) => `item${i}`)
const secondArr = new Array(250).fill(undefined).map((val, i) => `item${i}`)
const result = [new Set([firstArr, secondArr])]
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
reduce | |
loop | |
concat and filter | |
set |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
reduce | 6552.7 Ops/sec |
loop | 5901.5 Ops/sec |
concat and filter | 4937.6 Ops/sec |
set | 27704.6 Ops/sec |
Let's break down the provided benchmark and explain what is being tested, the options compared, and their pros and cons.
Benchmark Overview
The benchmark measures how fast JavaScript arrays can be merged and filtered to remove duplicates. The test cases provide different approaches to achieve this:
reduce
loop
concat
and filter
set
Options Compared
Each test case uses a different approach to merge and filter the array:
Array.prototype.reduce()
method, which applies a function to each element in the array (in this case, an accumulator) and returns the accumulated value.for
loop to iterate over both arrays and push unique elements into a result array.Array.prototype.concat()
method to merge the two arrays and then uses Array.prototype.filter()
to remove duplicates based on their index in the concatenated array.Set
data structure, which automatically removes duplicates when adding elements.Pros and Cons of Each Approach
Here's a brief summary of each approach:
concat()
is optimized for performance.Library/Tool Used
The benchmark uses the built-in JavaScript Array
prototype methods (reduce()
, concat()
, and filter()
), as well as the Set
data structure. These are all part of the standard JavaScript library, so no external libraries are required.
Special JS Feature/Syntax
None of the test cases use any special JavaScript features or syntax that would require additional explanation.
Alternative Approaches
Other approaches to merging and filtering arrays could include:
Map
data structure: Similar to Set
, but allows for key-value pairs.SparseArray
: An optimized version of Array
for sparse data.Keep in mind that the choice of approach depends on the specific use case and requirements. The benchmark provides a comparison of popular methods, but other approaches may be more suitable for certain scenarios.