var str = 'images/asia/tokyo.jpg'
`your lucky destination is: ${str}`
'your lucky destination is: ' + str
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
string-interpolation | |
string-concatenation |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
string-interpolation | 15244258.0 Ops/sec |
string-concatenation | 15389850.0 Ops/sec |
Let's break down the provided benchmark definition and test cases to understand what is being tested.
Benchmark Definition
The benchmark definition consists of two parts:
str
to a variable.Individual Test Cases
There are two test cases:
) to insert the value of
str` into a string. The syntax for template literals is:`${expression}`
+
operator to concatenate the string and the value of str
. The syntax is:'string' + str
Options Compared
The two options being compared are:
+
operator to concatenate strings.Pros and Cons of Each Approach
Template Literals (string-interpolation)
Pros:
replace()
and split()
Cons:
String Concatenation (string-concatenation)
Pros:
Cons:
Library and Purpose
There are no libraries explicitly mentioned in the benchmark definition. However, template literals (string-interpolation) rely on a standard JavaScript feature that is supported by most modern browsers.
Special JS Feature or Syntax
The +
operator used for string concatenation is a built-in JavaScript syntax that has been available since the early days of JavaScript. There are no special syntax features involved in this benchmark.
Other Alternatives
If you want to compare other approaches, here are some alternatives:
StringBuilder
or similar classes: If you're using a modern browser that supports it, you can use StringBuilder
or similar classes to concatenate strings.Keep in mind that these alternatives might not be relevant to the specific benchmark definition and test cases provided.