Benchmark: Palindrome checker

Script Preparation code:

function isPalindrome(input) {
  if (input.length <= 1) {
    return true;
  } else {
    return (input[0] === input[input.length-1]) &&
            isPalindrome(input.substring(1,input.length-1));
  }
}

Tests:

simple palindrome
isPalindrome('hannah')
not palindrome
isPalindrome('hanffdfsssnah')

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
simple palindrome
not palindrome

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: 3 years ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 11_2_3) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/89.0.4389.114 Safari/537.36

Browser/OS: Chrome 89 on Mac OS X 11.2.3

View result in a separate tab

Test name	Executions per second
simple palindrome	3067032.0 Ops/sec
not palindrome	2906642.0 Ops/sec

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated 2 months ago):

LLMs can make mistakes. Check important info.

Let's dive into explaining the benchmark and its test cases.

**Benchmark Overview**

The provided JSON represents a JavaScript microbenchmark for checking whether a given string is a palindrome or not. The benchmark is designed to measure the performance of different approaches in determining if a string is a palindrome.

**Script Preparation Code**

The script preparation code defines a function `isPalindrome(input)` that takes an input string and returns `true` if it's a palindrome, and `false` otherwise. This function uses recursion to compare characters from both ends of the string. If the first character matches the last character, and the substring between them is also a palindrome, then the entire string is a palindrome.

Here are some pros and cons of this approach:

Pros:

* Simple and easy to understand
* Uses recursion, which can be efficient for small inputs

Cons:

* Can be slow for large inputs due to recursive calls
* May cause stack overflow errors for very long strings

**Library Used**

The benchmark doesn't explicitly mention a library used in the script preparation code. However, it's worth noting that some JavaScript engines might have built-in optimizations or features that could affect the performance of this function.

**Special JS Feature/Syntax (None)**

There are no special JavaScript features or syntax used in this benchmark.

**Other Alternatives**

For palindromic string checks, alternative approaches include:

* Iterative methods: Instead of using recursion, you can use a loop to compare characters from both ends of the string.
* Boyer-Moore algorithm: A more efficient algorithm for palindrome detection, but it requires additional memory and is more complex to implement.

**Test Cases**

The benchmark includes two test cases:

1. "simple palindrome": The input string "hannah" is a palindrome.
2. "not palindrome": The input string "hanffdfsssnah" is not a palindrome.

Here are some pros and cons of each approach for these test cases:

Pros of the recursive approach for both test cases:

* Easy to understand and implement

Cons of the recursive approach for the "simple palindrome" test case:

* May be slow due to unnecessary recursive calls
* Could potentially cause stack overflow errors for very long strings

Cons of the recursive approach for the "not palindrome" test case:

* Still uses recursion, which might be slow for large inputs
* Might not work correctly if the input string is extremely long

In comparison, iterative approaches or more specialized algorithms like Boyer-Moore could potentially provide better performance and accuracy for larger inputs.

**Benchmark Result**

The latest benchmark result shows that Chrome 89 browser on a Desktop with Mac OS X 11.2.3 operating system executes the "simple palindrome" test case approximately 3067 times per second, while executing the "not palindrome" test case approximately 2906 times per second.

Related benchmarks:

Palindrome checker (version: 0)

Comparing performance of: simple palindrome vs not palindrome

Created: 8 years ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

simple palindrome

not palindrome

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Experimental features:

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated 2 months ago):