var str = "asdfgdf,gdf,foobar,sdfs,dfasdf";
var res = str.indexOf("foobar");
var res = str.split(",").includes("foobar");
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
string.indexOf() | |
array split and includes |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
string.indexOf() | 9578982.0 Ops/sec |
array split and includes | 2814887.0 Ops/sec |
I'd be happy to help explain the benchmark!
What is being tested?
The provided JSON represents a JavaScript microbenchmark that tests two different approaches for finding a substring within a string:
string.indexOf()
array split and includes
In the first approach, string.indexOf()
is used to search for a specific substring ("foobar") within the string "asdfgdf,gdf,foobar,sdfs,dfasdf". This method returns the index of the first occurrence of the substring if found, or -1 otherwise.
The second approach uses the split()
method to split the original string into an array of substrings using commas as separators. It then uses the includes()
method to check if "foobar" is included in the resulting array.
Options compared
In this benchmark, we have two main options being compared:
A) string.indexOf()
: a simple and efficient approach that's widely supported by JavaScript engines.
B) array split and includes
: an alternative approach that uses more operations (splitting and checking membership) to achieve the same result as indexOf()
.
Pros and cons of each approach
A) string.indexOf()
:
Pros:
Cons:
B) array split and includes
:
Pros:
indexOf()
is not sufficientCons:
indexOf()
, making it potentially slowerLibrary/External Functionality
In this benchmark, we don't see any explicit libraries or external functions being used. However, it's worth noting that the use of includes()
method might be specific to some JavaScript engines (e.g., Chrome).
Special JS Feature/Syntax
There are no special features or syntax being tested in this benchmark.
Other Alternatives
If you're looking for alternative approaches to finding a substring within a string, here are a few more:
RegExp
objects): This approach can be both faster and more flexible than indexOf()
, but may also have a steeper learning curve.substr()
/substring()
methods): These approaches might be slower than indexOf()
, but could provide more control over the search process.Keep in mind that these alternatives are not directly comparable to string.indexOf()
and array split and includes
without additional context.