var formatter = new Intl.NumberFormat("en-US");
var a = new Intl.NumberFormat("en-US").format("10000");
var a = "10000".toLocaleString("en-US");
var a = formatter.format("10000");
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
Intl.NumberFormat | |
toLocalString | |
Intl.NumberFormat With cached formatter |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
Intl.NumberFormat | 85244.9 Ops/sec |
toLocalString | 34586104.0 Ops/sec |
Intl.NumberFormat With cached formatter | 4185153.8 Ops/sec |
Let's break down the provided JSON and explain what is being tested.
Benchmark Overview
The benchmark compares three approaches for formatting numbers in JavaScript:
Intl.NumberFormat
toLocaleString
methodIntl.NumberFormat
Options Compared
Intl.NumberFormat
: formats numbers using the Internationalization API, which provides support for locale-specific formatting.toLocaleString
method: formats numbers based on the browser's built-in locale settings.Intl.NumberFormat
: uses a pre-cached instance of Intl.NumberFormat
to avoid re-creating the formatter on each execution.Pros and Cons
Intl.NumberFormat
:toLocaleString
method:Intl.NumberFormat
:Library/Technology Used
The Intl.NumberFormat
API uses the ECMAScript Internationalization API (ECMA-402) to provide support for locale-specific formatting. The toLocaleString
method relies on the browser's built-in locale settings, which are implemented using the same API.
Special JavaScript Feature/Syntax
None mentioned in this specific benchmark. However, it's worth noting that some browsers may have additional features or syntax for internationalization and localization that can be used with Intl.NumberFormat
.
Alternatives
Other approaches for formatting numbers in JavaScript include:
Keep in mind that the choice of approach depends on the specific requirements and constraints of your project.