<script src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/lodash/4.17.4/lodash.min.js"></script>
var value = [];
for(var i = 0; i < 1000; i++){
value[i] = i;
}
_.map(value, (x) => x*x);
value.map((x) => x*x);
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
lodash.map | |
native |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
lodash.map | 486161.0 Ops/sec |
native | 336993.3 Ops/sec |
Let's dive into the explanation of the provided benchmark.
Benchmark Overview
The benchmark compares two approaches to perform an iteration over an array in JavaScript: using Lodash (a popular utility library) and the native forEach
method.
Options Compared
_.map()
: This function creates a new array with the results of applying a provided function to each element in the original array.value.map((x) => x*x)
: This is a simple example of using the map
method on an array, where the callback function multiplies each element by itself.Pros and Cons
_.map()
:.map()
function is also generally fast and efficient.forEach
:forEach
method can lead to slower performance due to the overhead of the browser's event loop and the need to iterate over the array.Library Used
In this benchmark, Lodash is used for its .map()
function. Lodash is a popular utility library that provides a wide range of functions for common tasks, such as string manipulation, array operations, and more. The _.map()
function is specifically designed for mapping arrays to new values.
Special JavaScript Features
There are no special JavaScript features or syntax used in this benchmark beyond the standard language features provided by ECMAScript.
Other Considerations
Alternatives
If you're interested in exploring alternative approaches to iterating over arrays in JavaScript, here are some options:
forEach
method but with a slightly different syntax.useEffect
hook.Keep in mind that these alternatives might introduce additional dependencies or overhead, so be sure to consider the trade-offs when choosing an approach for your specific use case.