Benchmark: CLSX vs concat - MeasureThat.net

HTML Preparation code:


<script src='https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/classnames/2.3.2/index.min.js'></script>
<script src='https://unpkg.com/clsx@1.2.1/dist/clsx.min.js'></script>

Script Preparation code:

var str1 = 'av-absolute av-text-base av-text-av-gray-150 av-top-1/2 av-z-10 '
var str2 = 'dark:av-text-av-gray-150 '
var str3 = 'av-duration-300 av-transform av--translate-y-6 av-scale-75 av-origin-[0] av-left-4 '
var str4 = 'peer-focus:av-text-av-gray-150 peer-focus:dark:av-text-av-gray-150'

Tests:

clsx
let result = window.clsx(str1, str2, str3, str4)
concat
let result = str1 + str2 + str3 + str4

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
clsx
concat

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

ⓘ Get performance results from real users on your website with Request Metrics.

Website Performance Monitoring by Request Metrics

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: one year ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 12; RMX3370 Build/RKQ1.211103.002; wv) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/4.0 Chrome/107.0.5304.105 Mobile Safari/537.36

Browser/OS: Chrome Mobile 107 on Android

View result in a separate tab

Test name	Executions per second
clsx	1268046.0 Ops/sec
concat	2321480.0 Ops/sec

CLSX vs concat (version: 0)

CLSX perf

Comparing performance of: clsx vs concat

Created: one year ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

clsx

concat

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Experimental features:

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A