function thing(e) {
switch (e) {
case 0:
return "0";
case 1:
return "1";
case 2:
return "2";
case 3:
return "3";
default:
return "";
}
}
for (let t = 0; 1e5 > t; t++) thing(0), thing(2), thing(6);
function bounce(x)
{
if (x === 0) return "0";
if (x === 1) return "1";
if (x === 2) return "2";
if (x === 3) return "3";
return ""
}
for (let t = 0; 1e5 > t; t++) bounce(0), bounce(2), bounce(6);
function bounce(x) {
return 0 === x ? "0" : 1 === x ? "1" : 2 === x ? "2" : 3 === x ? "3" : "";
}
for (let t = 0; 1e5 > t; t++) bounce(0), bounce(2), bounce(6);
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
switch case | |
bounce patttern | |
ternary |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
switch case | 20315.4 Ops/sec |
bounce patttern | 20222.3 Ops/sec |
ternary | 20511.1 Ops/sec |
Let's dive into the world of JavaScript benchmarks!
The provided JSON represents a benchmarking test created on MeasureThat.net, which allows users to compare the performance of different approaches in JavaScript. The test consists of three individual test cases: "switch case", "bounce pattern", and "ternary".
Benchmark Definition
The overall benchmark definition is not explicitly stated in the provided JSON, but based on the individual test cases, we can infer that it's a comparison of the three approaches:
switch
statement to determine which string to return.if
statements to determine which string to return.?
) to concisely express the same logic as the other two approaches.Options being compared
The three options are:
switch
statement.if
statements.?
) used for conditional expressions.Pros and Cons of each approach:
switch
statements, and its syntax can make it harder to read and maintain.Library usage
In this benchmark, there is no explicit library usage. However, some libraries like Lodash
or Underscore.js
might be used to implement optimized versions of these approaches (e.g., using _.map()
for the bounce pattern).
Special JS features or syntax
There are no special JavaScript features or syntax explicitly mentioned in this benchmark.
Other alternatives
Some alternative approaches that could be explored in this benchmark include:
map()
and reduce()
for more concise logic.Conclusion
In conclusion, this benchmark provides a useful comparison of three different approaches in JavaScript: traditional switch
statements, bounce patterns, and ternary operators. By understanding the pros and cons of each approach, developers can make informed decisions when choosing the best method for their specific use cases.