MeasureThat.net
  • Create a benchmark
  • Online Toolsnew
  • About
  • Feedback
  • Buy me a coffeeBuy me a coffee

 .includes() vs .test() vs .match() vs .indexOf() vs .search() (version: 0)

Comparing performance of: text.includes() vs text.test() vs text.match() vs text.indexOf() vs text.search()

Created: one year ago by: Guest
Jump to the latest result
Script Preparation code:
Tests:

  • text.includes()

  • text.test()

  • text.match()

  • text.indexOf()

  • text.search()

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results
  • Test case name Result
    text.includes()
    text.test()
    text.match()
    text.indexOf()
    text.search()

    Fastest: N/A

    Slowest: N/A

ⓘ Get performance results from real users on your website with Request Metrics.
Website Performance Monitoring by Request Metrics
Latest run results:
Run details: (Test run date: one year ago)
Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_15_7) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/107.0.0.0 Safari/537.36 OPR/93.0.0.0
Opera 93 on Mac OS X 10.15.7
View result in a separate tab
Test name Executions per second
text.includes() 11854960.0 Ops/sec
text.test() 7758398.0 Ops/sec
text.match() 6248231.0 Ops/sec
text.indexOf() 12214760.0 Ops/sec
text.search() 2946570.0 Ops/sec