var obj = {
a: 1,
b: 2,
c: 3
}
delete obj.a
const { a, rest } = obj;
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
delete | |
des |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
delete | 13566485.0 Ops/sec |
des | 1484052.1 Ops/sec |
Let's dive into explaining what's being tested in this benchmark.
What is being tested?
MeasuringThat.net is testing the performance of two different approaches to achieve the same result: deleting a property from an object and using destructuring assignment (also known as "des" or "spread operator") to extract a subset of properties from an object.
The test cases are:
delete obj.a
: This approach deletes the property a
from the object obj
.const { a, ...rest } = obj;
: This approach uses destructuring assignment to extract the value of a
into a constant variable named a
, and assigns the rest of the properties to another constant variable named rest
.Options compared
The two approaches are being compared:
delete obj.a
: This approach is simple and straightforward, deleting the property directly.const { a, ...rest } = obj;
: This approach uses destructuring assignment to extract the desired properties.Pros and Cons of each approach:
delete obj.a
:
Pros:
Cons:
const { a, ...rest } = obj;
:
Pros:
Cons:
Library used:
In this benchmark, no libraries are explicitly mentioned. However, it's worth noting that some JavaScript engines may use internal optimizations or caching mechanisms that could affect the results.
Special JS feature or syntax:
No special features or syntax are being tested in this benchmark.
Other alternatives:
There are other ways to achieve the same result as delete obj.a
:
obj['a'] = undefined;
)const newObj = Object.create(obj); newObj.a = 1;
)However, these alternatives may have different performance implications and trade-offs compared to the delete
operator.
Overall, this benchmark is testing the performance of two different approaches to achieve a specific result in JavaScript. By understanding the pros and cons of each approach, developers can make informed decisions about which approach to use in their own code.