Benchmark: await delay vs setTimeout

Script Preparation code:

const delayA = time => new Promise(res=>setTimeout(res,time));
const delayT = (func, wait) => {
    var args = slice.call(arguments, 2);
    return setTimeout(function(){
      return func.apply(null, args);
    }, wait);
  };
var test = function(){
  return;
}

Tests:

delayA
(async function(){ await delayA(0); test(); return; })();
delayT
(async function(){ await delayT(test,0); return; })();
setTimeout
(async function(){ setTimeout(test,0); })();

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
delayA
delayT
setTimeout

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

ⓘ Get performance results from real users on your website with Request Metrics.

Website Performance Monitoring by Request Metrics

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: yesterday)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/127.0.0.0 Safari/537.36 OPR/113.0.0.0 (Edition Yx 05)

Browser/OS: Opera 113 on Windows

View result in a separate tab

Test name	Executions per second
delayA	147387.2 Ops/sec
delayT	141731.2 Ops/sec
setTimeout	783991.0 Ops/sec

await delay vs setTimeout (version: 0)

Comparing performance of: delayA vs delayT vs setTimeout

Created: 6 years ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

delayA

delayT

setTimeout

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Experimental features:

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A