Benchmark: Lodash, Set, Array comparison v2

HTML Preparation code:

<script src='https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/lodash.js/4.17.5/lodash.min.js'></script>

Script Preparation code:

const rand = () => Math.floor(Math.random() * 1000)

var arrays = Array(12).fill(null).map(()=>Array(81).fill(null))

arrays = arrays.map((b) => {return b.map(c => {return rand()})})

Tests:

Lodash
_.intersection(...arrays)
Array
arrays.reduce((a, b) => a.filter(c => b.includes(c)))
Set
new Set(...arrays)

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
Lodash
Array
Set

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

ⓘ Get performance results from real users on your website with Request Metrics.

Website Performance Monitoring by Request Metrics

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: one year ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/106.0.0.0 Safari/537.36

Browser/OS: Chrome 106 on Windows

View result in a separate tab

Test name	Executions per second
Lodash	155793.3 Ops/sec
Array	732976.1 Ops/sec
Set	485485.3 Ops/sec

Lodash, Set, Array comparison v2 (version: 0)

Comparing performance of: Lodash vs Array vs Set

Created: one year ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

Lodash

Array

Set

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Experimental features:

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A