Benchmark: Compare performance of _.get to es6 destructuring

Compare performance of _.get to es6 destructuring (version: 2)

Comparing performance of: destructuring with defaults, empty input vs lodash get, empty input vs destructuring with defaults, find item vs lodash get, find item vs destructuring dynamic key vs lodash dynamic key vs Optional chaining vs lodash get vs Optional chaining with dynamic key vs lodash get with dynamic key

Created: 2 years ago by: Registered User

Jump to the latest result

HTML Preparation code:

<script src='https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/lodash.js/4.17.5/lodash.min.js'></script>

Script Preparation code:

function destructuringFn(input) {
  const { contextMenu: { data: { documents = [] } = {} } = {} } = input;
  return documents;
}

function destructuringFnDynamic(input, key) {
  const { contextMenu: { data: { [key]: documents = [] } = {} } = {} } = input;
  return documents;
}

function lodashFn(input) {
  const documents = _.get(input, 'contextMenu.data.documents', []);
  return documents;
}

function lodashFnDynamic(input, key) {
  const documents = _.get(input, `contextMenu.data.${key}`, []);
  return documents;
}

function optionalChainFn() {
  const input = { contextMenu: { data: { documents: ["data"] }}};
  return input?.contextMenu?.data?.documents;
}
  
function optionalChainFnDynamic(key) {
  const input = { contextMenu: { data: { documents: ["data"] }}};
  return input?.contextMenu?.data?.[key];
}

function lodashGetFn() {
  const input = { contextMenu: { data: { documents: ["data"] }}};
  const documents = _.get(input, 'contextMenu.data.documents', []);
  return documents;
}

function lodashGetFnDynamic(key) {
  const input = { contextMenu: { data: { documents: ["data"] }}};
  const documents = _.get(input, `contextMenu.data[key]`, []);
  return documents;
}

function test(fn, input, key) {
  fn(input, key);
}

Tests:

destructuring with defaults, empty input
test(destructuringFn, {});
lodash get, empty input
test(lodashFn, {});
destructuring with defaults, find item
const input = { contextMenu: { data: { documents: [{ id: 'doc' }] } } }; test(destructuringFn, input);
lodash get, find item
const input = { contextMenu: { data: { documents: [{ id: 'doc' }] } } }; test(lodashFn, input);
destructuring dynamic key
const input = { contextMenu: { data: { documents: [{ id: 'doc' }] } } }; test(destructuringFnDynamic, input, 'documents');
lodash dynamic key
const input = { contextMenu: { data: { documents: [{ id: 'doc' }] } } }; test(lodashFnDynamic, input, 'documents');
Optional chaining
test(optionalChainFn);
lodash get
test(lodashGetFn);
Optional chaining with dynamic key
test(optionalChainFnDynamic, 'documents');
lodash get with dynamic key
test(lodashGetFnDynamic, 'documents');

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
destructuring with defaults, empty input
lodash get, empty input
destructuring with defaults, find item
lodash get, find item
destructuring dynamic key
lodash dynamic key
Optional chaining
lodash get
Optional chaining with dynamic key
lodash get with dynamic key

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: 2 years ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/106.0.0.0 Safari/537.36

Browser/OS: Chrome 106 on Windows

View result in a separate tab

Test name	Executions per second
destructuring with defaults, empty input	8152507.0 Ops/sec
lodash get, empty input	2346893.8 Ops/sec
destructuring with defaults, find item	2882357.2 Ops/sec
lodash get, find item	1509302.5 Ops/sec
destructuring dynamic key	2899871.8 Ops/sec
lodash dynamic key	1179403.2 Ops/sec
Optional chaining	3291900.2 Ops/sec
lodash get	1645058.6 Ops/sec
Optional chaining with dynamic key	3597657.2 Ops/sec
lodash get with dynamic key	1573356.8 Ops/sec

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one month ago):

LLMs can make mistakes. Check important info.

Related benchmarks:

Compare performance of _.get to es6 destructuring (version: 2)

Created: 2 years ago by: Registered User

Jump to the latest result

destructuring with defaults, empty input

lodash get, empty input

destructuring with defaults, find item

lodash get, find item

destructuring dynamic key

lodash dynamic key

Optional chaining

lodash get

Optional chaining with dynamic key

lodash get with dynamic key

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Experimental features:

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one month ago):