Benchmark: testest - MeasureThat.net

HTML Preparation code:

<script src="https://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/angularjs/1.5.3/angular.min.js"></script>

Script Preparation code:

var ment = angular.module('ent', []);
	ment.controller('EntCtrl', function($compile,$scope) {
	  window.compileE = compileE;
	  function compileE(code) {
	    var scope = $scope.$new();
	    $compile(code)(scope);
	    scope.$destroy();
	  }
	});
	eMent = angular.element('<div><div ng-controller="EntCtrl"></div></div>');
	angular.element(document.body).append(eMent);
	angular.bootstrap(eMent[0], ['ent']);

Tests:

ng
window.compileE('<div ng-click="click()"></div>');
native
window.compileE('<div onclick="click()"></div>');

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
ng
native

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated 27 days ago):

LLMs can make mistakes. Check important info.

**Benchmark Overview**

MeasureThat.net is a website that allows users to create and run JavaScript microbenchmarks. The provided benchmark involves creating an AngularJS application with two test cases: one using Angular's built-in `ng` directive and another using native HTML attributes (`onclick`) for the same functionality.

**Script Preparation Code**

The script preparation code defines an AngularJS module named "ent" with a single controller named "EntCtrl". The controller has a method called `compileE` that takes a JavaScript expression as input, compiles it using `$compile`, and executes it on a newly created scope. This allows the test to measure the performance of compiling and executing JavaScript code.

The script also sets up an AngularJS element with an ng-controller directive pointing to the "EntCtrl" controller.

**Html Preparation Code**

The HTML preparation code includes a reference to the AngularJS library (version 1.5.3).

**Test Cases**

There are two test cases:

1. **ng**: This test case uses Angular's built-in `ng` directive to compile and execute JavaScript code.
2. **native**: This test case uses native HTML attributes (`onclick`) for the same functionality.

**Comparison of Options**

The two options being compared are:

* **Angular's ng** directive vs. **Native HTML attributes (onclick)**
* Both approaches aim to achieve the same result: compiling and executing JavaScript code.
* The main difference lies in how this compilation and execution is achieved:
	+ Angular's `ng` directive uses a proprietary compiler that takes care of parsing, compiling, and executing the JavaScript code.
	+ Native HTML attributes (`onclick`) rely on the browser's built-in engine to execute the JavaScript code.

**Pros and Cons**

* **Angular's ng**: Pros:
	+ Provides a standardized way of compiling and executing JavaScript code.
	+ Can take advantage of Angular's optimizations and caching mechanisms.
	+ Typically faster and more efficient than native approaches.
*	Cons:
	+ Requires AngularJS to be included in the HTML file, which can add overhead.
	+ May not perform well for very small or simple expressions.
* **Native HTML attributes**: Pros:
	+ Does not require any additional libraries or overhead.
	+ Can potentially be faster for very small or simple expressions.
	+ More straightforward to implement and debug.
* Cons:
	+ May not provide the same level of optimization and caching as Angular's compiler.
	+ Requires more manual effort to ensure correct parsing and execution of the JavaScript code.

**Library: AngularJS**

AngularJS is a JavaScript framework that provides a set of features and tools for building web applications. The `ng` directive used in this benchmark is part of AngularJS, which allows developers to create dynamic web pages with data-binding capabilities.

In this context, AngularJS is used to provide a standardized way of compiling and executing JavaScript code, making it easier to compare different approaches.

**Special JS Feature/Syntax**

There are no special JS features or syntax mentioned in the benchmark that require any specific knowledge or expertise. However, it's worth noting that AngularJS uses a proprietary compiler that may not be immediately familiar to developers who are not already familiar with the framework.

**Other Alternatives**

Other alternatives for compiling and executing JavaScript code include:

* **Babel**: A transpiler that can convert modern JavaScript code to older syntax that is supported by many browsers.
* **Webpack**: A module bundler that can compile and execute JavaScript code in a more efficient and optimized way.
* **V8 JavaScript Engine**: The engine used by Google Chrome and other browsers to execute JavaScript code.

These alternatives may offer different trade-offs in terms of performance, complexity, and ease of use, depending on the specific requirements of the application.

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: 6 months ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/122.0.0.0 YaBrowser/24.4.0.0 Safari/537.36

Browser/OS: Yandex Browser 24 on Windows

View result in a separate tab

Test name	Executions per second
ng	40738.1 Ops/sec
native	38927.4 Ops/sec

Related benchmarks:

testest (version: 0)

Comparing performance of: ng vs native

Created: 6 years ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

ng

native

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Experimental features:

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated 27 days ago):