MeasureThat.net
  • Create a benchmark
  • Online Toolsnew
  • About
  • Feedback
  • Buy me a coffeeBuy me a coffee

 toString vs template literals fixed (version: 0)

add random numbers

Comparing performance of: random + .toString() vs random + template literal vs .toString() vs template literal

Created: one year ago by: Guest
Jump to the latest result
Script Preparation code:
Tests:

  • random + .toString()

  • random + template literal

  • .toString()

  • template literal

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results
  • Test case name Result
    random + .toString()
    random + template literal
    .toString()
    template literal

    Fastest: N/A

    Slowest: N/A

ⓘ Get performance results from real users on your website with Request Metrics.
Website Performance Monitoring by Request Metrics
Latest run results:
Run details: (Test run date: one year ago)
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/106.0.0.0 Safari/537.36
Chrome 106 on Linux
View result in a separate tab
Test name Executions per second
random + .toString() 2853641.0 Ops/sec
random + template literal 6939946.0 Ops/sec
.toString() 19950760.0 Ops/sec
template literal 20577150.0 Ops/sec