Benchmark: luxon vs datefns vs moment vs new Date

HTML Preparation code:

<script src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/npm/luxon@1.26.0/build/global/luxon.min.js"></script>
<script src="https://igor.moomers.org/random/datefns.js"></script>
<script src='https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/moment.js/2.22.0/moment.min.js'></script>

Script Preparation code:

window.ds = "2020-02-19T00:51:53.623839+00:00";

Tests:

datefns
window.datefns.parseISO(window.ds)
luxon
luxon.DateTime.fromISO(ds);
moment
moment(ds)
native date
new Date(ds);

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
datefns
luxon
moment
native date

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

ⓘ Get performance results from real users on your website with Request Metrics.

Website Performance Monitoring by Request Metrics

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: one year ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_15_7) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/109.0.0.0 Safari/537.36

Browser/OS: Chrome 109 on Mac OS X 10.15.7

View result in a separate tab

Test name	Executions per second
datefns	418828.4 Ops/sec
luxon	273988.1 Ops/sec
moment	98797.6 Ops/sec
native date	2187555.0 Ops/sec

luxon vs datefns vs moment vs new Date (version: 0)

Comparing performance of: datefns vs luxon vs moment vs native date

Created: one year ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

datefns

luxon

moment

native date

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Experimental features:

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A