Benchmark: Create Element v2

HTML Preparation code:

<script src="//ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jquery/3.1.1/jquery.min.js"></script>

Tests:

Vanilla JS with jQuery
var el = $(document.createElement('div'));
Jquery
var el = $('<div>');
Pure Vanilla
var el = document.createElement('div');

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
Vanilla JS with jQuery
Jquery
Pure Vanilla

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated 25 days ago):

LLMs can make mistakes. Check important info.

Let's break down the provided benchmark definition and test cases.

**Benchmark Definition**

The benchmark definition is a JSON object that represents the JavaScript code to be executed in each test case. In this case, there is only one benchmark definition with an empty "Description" field and no "Script Preparation Code". The HTML preparation code includes a link to jQuery library, which is loaded dynamically before running the JavaScript tests.

**Options Compared**

The three options being compared are:

1. **Vanilla JS with jQuery**: This option uses the `jQuery` library to create an element.
2. **JQuery**: This option uses only the `jQuery` library to create an element.
3. **Pure Vanilla**: This option creates an element without using any external libraries, relying on native JavaScript methods.

**Pros and Cons of Each Approach**

1. **Vanilla JS with jQuery**:
	* Pros: Simplifies element creation and provides a more straightforward way to work with DOM elements.
	* Cons: Introduces additional overhead due to the jQuery library, which may impact performance.
2. **JQuery**:
	* Pros: Provides an efficient way to manipulate DOM elements and has built-in features like event handling and animation capabilities.
	* Cons: May introduce additional dependencies and overhead compared to native JavaScript methods.
3. **Pure Vanilla**:
	* Pros: Optimizes performance by not introducing any external library overhead, allowing for direct manipulation of DOM elements using native JavaScript methods.
	* Cons: Requires more code and expertise to create elements correctly.

**Library: jQuery**

jQuery is a popular JavaScript library that simplifies HTML document traversal, event handling, and DOM manipulation. It provides a consistent interface across different browsers and versions. In the context of this benchmark, jQuery is used to load dynamically before running the JavaScript tests.

**Special JS Feature/Syntax (not applicable in this case)**

Since there are no special JavaScript features or syntaxes being tested, we can skip this explanation.

**Other Alternatives**

If you need alternatives for creating elements without using jQuery, consider:

* **DOMTraversals**: This is a built-in JavaScript method that allows traversing the DOM tree. You can use it to create elements from scratch.
* **createElement**, **appendChild**, and other native methods: These are basic DOM element creation methods that don't rely on any external libraries.

However, keep in mind that these alternatives might be less efficient or more cumbersome than using jQuery.

Overall, this benchmark provides a useful comparison of three different approaches to creating elements with JavaScript. It allows users to see the performance differences between vanilla JavaScript, jQuery, and pure vanilla JavaScript methods.

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: 2 years ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:105.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/105.0

Browser/OS: Firefox 105 on Linux

View result in a separate tab

Test name	Executions per second
Vanilla JS with jQuery	1499222.6 Ops/sec
Jquery	1408650.0 Ops/sec
Pure Vanilla	2095284.6 Ops/sec

Related benchmarks:

Create Element v2 (version: 0)

Comparing performance of: Vanilla JS with jQuery vs Jquery vs Pure Vanilla

Created: 2 years ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

Vanilla JS with jQuery

Jquery

Pure Vanilla

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Experimental features:

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated 25 days ago):