Benchmark: 546546518484 - MeasureThat.net

Tests:

Lista
const opcion = 'z'; if (opcion === 'a') { } else if (opcion === 'e') { } else if (opcion === 'i') { } else if (opcion === 'o') { } else if (opcion === 'u') { } else { }
Complicado
const opcion = 'z'; if (opcion === 'a' || opcion === 'e' || opcion === 'i' || opcion === 'o' || opcion === 'u') { if (opcion === 'a') { } else if (opcion === 'e') { } else if (opcion === 'i') { } else if (opcion === 'o') { } else { } } else { }

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
Lista
Complicado

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one month ago):

LLMs can make mistakes. Check important info.

Let's break down the provided JSON data and explain what is tested on the provided benchmark.

**Benchmark Definition**

The benchmark definition represents a JavaScript code snippet that is used to measure the performance of the browser. In this case, there are two benchmarks: "Lista" and "Complicado". The benchmarks are identical except for the way they handle the `opcion` variable.

**Comparison of Options**

There are three main options compared:

1. **Single `if-else` chain**: This option uses a single `if-else` chain to check the value of `opcion`. For each possible value, it checks if `opcion` matches that value and executes some code if it does.
2. **Multi-or operator (`||`)**: This option uses the multi-or operator (`||`) to check if `opcion` is one of the specified values. If any of the conditions are true, it executes some code.
3. **Ternary operator (`?:`)**: This option uses a ternary operator to check the value of `opcion`. The expression `opcion === 'a' ? ... : ...` checks if `opcion` is equal to `'a'`, and if so, executes one set of code; otherwise, it executes another set.

**Pros and Cons**

* **Single `if-else` chain**: Pros:
	+ Easy to understand and maintain.
	+ Typically faster than the other options due to fewer branches.
* Cons:
	+ Can be slower for larger numbers of possible values due to more branches.
* **Multi-or operator (`||`)**: Pros:
	+ Faster than a single `if-else` chain for large numbers of possible values.
	+ Allows for easier addition of new values without modifying the code.
* Cons:
	+ Can be slower than a ternary operator for small numbers of possible values due to additional branches.
	+ May have performance implications if not implemented correctly (e.g., using `||` with `&&` can lead to unexpected behavior).
* **Ternary operator (`?:`)**: Pros:
	+ Typically faster than a single `if-else` chain for small numbers of possible values.
	+ Can be more readable and maintainable than a multi-or operator.
* Cons:
	+ May have performance implications if not implemented correctly (e.g., using `?:` with multiple conditions can lead to slower execution).

**Library Usage**

There is no library usage in the provided benchmarks.

**Special JS Features or Syntax**

None of the tests use any special JavaScript features or syntax.

**Alternatives**

If you need to test similar JavaScript code, consider using a testing framework like Jest, Mocha, or Cypress. These frameworks provide a robust way to write and run tests for your JavaScript code, including support for various benchmarking libraries like Benchmark.js or Benchmark-Sharp.

For browser-specific benchmarking, you can use tools like:

* ` benchmarks.js`: A simple benchmarking library for Node.js.
* `browser-benchmarking`: A set of scripts that provide a basic benchmarking framework for testing browser performance.
* `Chrome DevTools`: Provides built-in support for benchmarking web pages.

Keep in mind that the choice of tool or library will depend on your specific use case, performance requirements, and familiarity with JavaScript.

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: 2 years ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/105.0.0.0 Safari/537.36

Browser/OS: Chrome 105 on Windows

View result in a separate tab

Test name	Executions per second
Lista	2287164928.0 Ops/sec
Complicado	2281035264.0 Ops/sec

Related benchmarks:

546546518484 (version: 0)

Complicado lista

Comparing performance of: Lista vs Complicado

Created: 2 years ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

Lista

Complicado

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Experimental features:

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one month ago):