Benchmark: bignumber.js vs. big.js

HTML Preparation code:

<script src='https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/npm/bignumber.js@9.1.0/bignumber.min.js'></script>
<script src='https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/npm/big.js@6.2.1/big.min.js'></script>

Script Preparation code:

Big.RM = Big.roundDown
Big.DP = 18
BigNumber.set({ DECIMAL_PLACES: 18, ROUNDING_MODE: BigNumber.ROUND_DOWN })

Tests:

big.js
var a = new Big("0.0002247752"); var b = new Big("0.2"); a.plus(b).mul(b).div(a).toString();
bignumber.js
var a = new BigNumber("0.0002247752"); var b = new BigNumber("0.2"); a.plus(b).multipliedBy(b).dividedBy(a).toString();

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
big.js
bignumber.js

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

ⓘ Get performance results from real users on your website with Request Metrics.

Website Performance Monitoring by Request Metrics

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: one year ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:104.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/104.0

Browser/OS: Firefox 104 on Mac OS X 10.15

View result in a separate tab

Test name	Executions per second
big.js	186891.8 Ops/sec
bignumber.js	307809.3 Ops/sec

bignumber.js vs. big.js (version: 0)

- https://github.com/MikeMcl/bignumber.js - https://github.com/MikeMcl/big.js

Comparing performance of: big.js vs bignumber.js

Created: one year ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

big.js

bignumber.js

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Experimental features:

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A