document.body.innerHTML = "";
let root = document.createElement("div");
for (let i = 0; i < 1000; i++) {
let e = document.createElement("span");
e.innerText = i + " text";
root.appendChild(e);
}
document.body.appendChild(root);
let frag = document.createDocumentFragment();
for (let i = 0; i < 1000; i++) {
let e = document.createElement("span");
e.innerText = i + " text";
frag.appendChild(e);
}
document.body.appendChild(frag);
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
createElement | |
createDocumentFragment |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
createElement | 250.6 Ops/sec |
createDocumentFragment | 267.2 Ops/sec |
Let's break down the provided benchmark and its test cases.
Benchmark Purpose:
The purpose of this benchmark is to compare the performance of two ways to append elements to the DOM in JavaScript:
document.createElement()
(Test Case: "createElement")document.createDocumentFragment()
(Test Case: "createDocumentFragment")The benchmark is designed to create 1000 span
elements and append them to a container element using each of these two methods, and then appends the container element to the DOM.
Options Compared:
Pros and Cons of Each Approach:
Pros:
Cons:
Pros:
Cons:
Library/Feature Used:
In this benchmark, there is no explicit library or feature used that requires special knowledge. However, the use of document.createDocumentFragment()
relies on an understanding of the DOM's fragment mechanism.
Special JS Feature/Syntax:
There are no special JavaScript features or syntaxes mentioned in the provided code.
Other Considerations:
Alternatives:
Other approaches to appending elements to the DOM might include:
Keep in mind that these alternatives may require more complex code and understanding of additional concepts, but can potentially offer better performance and scalability benefits.