Benchmark: Filter vs Set (unique)

Script Preparation code:

var array = Array.from({ length: 60 }, () => Math.floor(Math.random() * 140));

var filterF = function(arr) { return arr.filter((a, b) => array.indexOf(a) === b) }
var filterS = function(arr) { return [...new Set(array)] }
var sf = function(arr) { return Array.from(new Set(arr)) }

Tests:

Filter
const a = filterF(array)
Set spread
const b = filterS(array)
From set
const c = sf(array)

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
Filter
Set spread
From set

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

ⓘ Get performance results from real users on your website with Request Metrics.

Website Performance Monitoring by Request Metrics

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: one year ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/105.0.0.0 Safari/537.36

Browser/OS: Chrome 105 on Linux

View result in a separate tab

Test name	Executions per second
Filter	138468.1 Ops/sec
Set spread	384861.0 Ops/sec
From set	331115.8 Ops/sec

Filter vs Set (unique) (version: 0)

Compare 3 ways to remove duplicates

Comparing performance of: Filter vs Set spread vs From set

Created: one year ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

Filter

Set spread

From set

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Experimental features:

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A