function makeTestData() { return 1; }
makeTestData().toString()
JSON.stringify(makeTestData());
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
toString | |
JSON.stringify |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
toString | 13081801.0 Ops/sec |
JSON.stringify | 3744487.0 Ops/sec |
Let's break down the provided benchmark test cases and explain what's being tested, compared, and discussed.
Benchmark Test Cases
The benchmark has two individual test cases:
toString
: This test case measures the execution time of converting an integer to a string using JavaScript's built-in toString()
method.JSON.stringify
: This test case measures the execution time of converting an object (in this case, a simple integer value) to a JSON string using the JSON.stringify()
method.Options Compared
The two options being compared are:
toString()
method to convert an integer to a string.JSON.stringify()
method to convert an object (in this case, an integer value) to a JSON string.Pros and Cons of Each Approach
Here's a brief summary of the pros and cons of each approach:
toString()
Method:toString()
on a number vs. a string).JSON.stringify()
Method:replacer
and space
.Library Used
In this benchmark, no specific JavaScript library is mentioned. However, it's worth noting that JSON.stringify()
relies on the built-in JSON object in JavaScript.
Special JS Feature or Syntax
None are explicitly mentioned in this benchmark. However, it's essential to note that the behavior of both toString()
and JSON.stringify()
can be influenced by other JavaScript features, such as:
global
object (in some environments)Number
and String
prototypes (in some browsers)Alternative Approaches
Other alternatives for converting integers to strings or objects to JSON strings include:
new String(123)
).toJSON()
method.Keep in mind that these alternatives might introduce additional overhead, complexity, or dependencies compared to the built-in methods used in this benchmark.
Device-Specific Considerations
The provided benchmark results are from a Chrome 105 build on a Windows desktop device. The execution times may vary significantly across different devices, browsers, and environments due to factors like:
To account for these variations, it's essential to run benchmarks in multiple scenarios to ensure reliable results.
By understanding the test cases, options compared, and potential pros and cons of each approach, you'll be better equipped to analyze and optimize performance-critical code snippets.