var string = ' '
string.replace(/^\s+|\s+$|\s+(?=\s)/g, '')
string.trim()
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
regex | |
trim |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
regex | 7176211.5 Ops/sec |
trim | 13172705.0 Ops/sec |
Let's dive into explaining the benchmark.
The provided JSON represents a JavaScript microbenchmark that compares two approaches for removing whitespace from a string: regular expressions (regex) and the trim()
method, specifically version 2 (string.trim(v2)
). We'll break down what each approach tests, their pros and cons, and discuss other considerations.
What is tested?
The benchmark consists of two test cases:
trim()
method with version 2 (string.trim(v2)
) to remove leading and trailing whitespace from a string.Options compared
The two options being compared are:
Pros and cons of each approach:
Other considerations
trim(v2)
method is a version 2 implementation of the trim method. This might imply that there are previous versions, such as string.trim()
, which could be tested for compatibility or to understand the evolution of this method.Library and purpose
There isn't an explicit library mentioned in the provided JSON. However, it's likely that the benchmark is using the built-in string
object and its methods, such as trim()
and replace()
, which are part of the standard JavaScript API.
Special JS feature or syntax
This benchmark doesn't explicitly use any special JavaScript features or syntax.
Other alternatives
If you were to implement this benchmark from scratch, you could also compare other approaches for removing whitespace, such as:
lodash
which has a trim()
methodKeep in mind that the performance difference between these approaches might be negligible compared to the built-in methods.
Overall, this benchmark provides a simple and controlled environment to compare two common string manipulation techniques: regex and the trim method. By understanding the pros and cons of each approach, you can make informed decisions about which one to use in your own code.