<script src='https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/moment.js/2.22.0/moment.min.js'></script>
moment().add(1, 'd');
new Date(new Date(new Date().toISOString()).getDate() + 1).toISOString();
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
Moment | |
Native |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
Moment | 616712.4 Ops/sec |
Native | 297247.9 Ops/sec |
Let's break down the benchmark definition and test cases.
Overview
The provided JSON represents a JavaScript microbenchmarking test case, which compares the performance of two approaches: using Moment.js to create an ISO string with a date offset, and creating an ISO string directly from a Date object. The goal is to determine which approach is faster.
What's being tested?
Two specific methods are being compared:
moment().add(1, 'd');
: This line of code uses the Moment.js library to create an ISO string with a date offset of 1 day.new Date(new Date(new Date().toISOString()).getDate() + 1).toISOString();
: This line of code creates a new Date object by adding 1 day to the current date, and then converts it to an ISO string using the toISOString()
method.Options compared
The two approaches being tested are:
Pros and Cons of each approach:
Library: Moment.js
Moment.js is a popular JavaScript library for working with dates. Its primary purpose is to simplify date and time manipulation by providing an intuitive API for tasks like calculating offsets, parsing dates from strings, and converting between different date formats.
Special JS feature or syntax: None mentioned
There are no special JavaScript features or syntax being used in this benchmark that would require specific knowledge of modern JavaScript features like async/await, Promises, or destructuring.
Other alternatives
If you were to implement a similar benchmark without using an existing library like Moment.js, you could consider the following alternatives:
Date
object and its methods (e.g., getTime()
, setDate()
, etc.)Keep in mind that using a specialized library like Moment.js can often simplify code and reduce errors. However, it also introduces dependencies and potential overhead.
In this specific benchmark, the focus is on comparing two simple approaches to create an ISO string from a Date object.