var str = "abcdefg\n".repeat(1000);
var res1 = str.split(`\n`).join(`hijklmnop\n`);
var res = str.replace(/(.+|)?\n/gm, `$1hijklmnop\n`);
var res = str.replace(/(.+|)?\n/gm, (match, v) => `${v}hijklmnop\n`);
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
array | |
regex | |
regex fn |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
array | 9226.7 Ops/sec |
regex | 11128.8 Ops/sec |
regex fn | 3718.3 Ops/sec |
Let's dive into the world of JavaScript microbenchmarks on MeasureThat.net.
The provided JSON represents a benchmark test case that compares three approaches for replacing newline characters in a string:
split()
and join()
methods to replace newline characters.Options Comparison
The three approaches differ in their syntax, efficiency, and potential impact on performance:
Library Usage
There is no library explicitly mentioned in this benchmark. However, it's worth noting that some libraries like Lodash or Ramda provide utility functions for string manipulation, which could potentially be used to implement these methods.
Special JS Features/Syntax
The benchmark uses arrow functions (introduced in ECMAScript 2015) and template literals (also introduced in ECMAScript 2015), but does not explicitly use any special JavaScript features or syntax that would require specific knowledge of the language. The regular expression syntax used is a standard RegExp object syntax.
Other Alternatives
If you're interested in exploring alternative approaches for string manipulation, consider the following:
: The Internationalization API provides methods like
Intl.DateTimeFormatand
Intl.NumberFormat`, but also includes some useful string manipulation functions.These alternatives may offer different trade-offs in terms of performance, readability, and syntax complexity. MeasureThat.net provides an excellent platform to experiment with various approaches and find the most efficient solution for your specific use case.