var x = 12.030303;
x.toString().match(/^-?\d+(?:\.\d{0,2})?/)[0];
var x = 12.030303;
x.toFixed(2);
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
Regex | |
toFixed |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
Regex | 13440631.0 Ops/sec |
toFixed | 5468258.5 Ops/sec |
Let's dive into the world of MeasureThat.net and explore what's being tested in this benchmark.
Benchmark Overview
The benchmark is comparing two approaches to formatting a fixed-point number: using regular expressions (Regex
) versus the toFixed()
method.
Options Compared
There are two options being compared:
/^-?\\d+(?:\\.\\d{0,2})?/
is used to match the desired format.toFixed()
method to explicitly format the number with two decimal places.Pros and Cons of Each Approach
Library Usage
There is no explicit library usage in the benchmark definitions. However, it's worth noting that toFixed()
is a standard JavaScript method provided by most browsers, whereas regular expressions may require additional libraries or configuration.
Special JavaScript Features/Syntax
This benchmark does not explicitly use any special JavaScript features or syntax, such as async/await, Promises, or modern JavaScript features like arrow functions. The focus is on the simple formatting task at hand.
Other Alternatives
If you're looking for alternatives to this approach, consider:
lodash
or moment.js
for complex formatting tasks.Number.prototype.toExponential()
or Number.prototype.toPrecision()
, which may provide faster performance for certain use cases.Benchmark Preparation Code
The benchmark preparation code is minimal, as it only includes the JavaScript code being tested:
var x = 12.030303;
x.toString().match(/^-?\\d+(?:\\.\\d{0,2})?/)[0];
or
var x = 12.030303;
x.toFixed(2);
Latest Benchmark Result
The latest benchmark results show the performance of each approach:
Test Name | ExecutionsPerSecond |
---|---|
Regex | 13440631.0 |
toFixed | 5468258.5 |
In this case, the Regex
approach is significantly faster than the toFixed()
method.