Benchmark: filter vs slice+concat

Tests:

selectionToggleUsingIndexOfSliceConcat
const selectedAddressGroupIds = Array.from( new Set(new Array(500).fill(null).map(() => Math.floor(Math.random() * 5000))) ); const toggleAddressGroupIds = Array.from( new Set(new Array(50).fill(null).map(() => Math.floor(Math.random() * 5000))) ); const selectionToggleUsingIndexOfSliceConcat = (addressGroupId) => { const selectedIndex = selectedAddressGroupIds.indexOf(addressGroupId); let newSelected = []; // Following will be faster than `Array.filter()` because `Array.indexOf()` & `Array.concat()` combined together is faster if (selectedIndex === -1) { newSelected = newSelected.concat(selectedAddressGroupIds, addressGroupId); } else if (selectedIndex === 0) { newSelected = newSelected.concat(selectedAddressGroupIds.slice(1)); } else if (selectedIndex === selectedAddressGroupIds.length - 1) { newSelected = newSelected.concat(selectedAddressGroupIds.slice(0, -1)); } else if (selectedIndex > 0) { newSelected = newSelected.concat( selectedAddressGroupIds.slice(0, selectedIndex), selectedAddressGroupIds.slice(selectedIndex + 1) ); } return newSelected; }; toggleAddressGroupIds.map(selectionToggleUsingIndexOfSliceConcat);
selectionToggleUsingFilter
const selectedAddressGroupIds = Array.from( new Set(new Array(500).fill(null).map(() => Math.floor(Math.random() * 5000))) ); const toggleAddressGroupIds = Array.from( new Set(new Array(50).fill(null).map(() => Math.floor(Math.random() * 5000))) ); const selectionToggleUsingFilter = (addressGroupId) => { const selectedIndex = selectedAddressGroupIds.indexOf(addressGroupId); let newSelected = []; // Following will be faster than `Array.filter()` because `Array.indexOf()` & `Array.concat()` combined together is faster if (selectedIndex === -1) { newSelected = newSelected.concat(selectedAddressGroupIds, addressGroupId); } else { newSelected = selectedAddressGroupIds.filter((id) => id !== addressGroupId); } return newSelected; }; toggleAddressGroupIds.map(selectionToggleUsingFilter);

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
selectionToggleUsingIndexOfSliceConcat
selectionToggleUsingFilter

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

ⓘ Get performance results from real users on your website with Request Metrics.

Website Performance Monitoring by Request Metrics

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: one month ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:122.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/122.0

Browser/OS: Firefox 122 on Linux

View result in a separate tab

Test name	Executions per second
selectionToggleUsingIndexOfSliceConcat	3444.9 Ops/sec
selectionToggleUsingFilter	3293.6 Ops/sec

filter vs slice+concat (version: 0)

Comparing performance of: selectionToggleUsingIndexOfSliceConcat vs selectionToggleUsingFilter

Created: one year ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

selectionToggleUsingIndexOfSliceConcat

selectionToggleUsingFilter

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Experimental features:

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A