<div></div>
<div></div>
<div></div>
<div></div>
<div></div>
<div></div>
<div></div>
<div></div>
<div></div>
<div></div>
const allDivs = document.querySelectorAll('div');
for(let i = 0; i < allDivs.length; i++);
const allDivs = document.getElementsByTagName('div');
for(let i = 0; i < allDivs.length; i++);
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
querySelectorAll | |
getElementsByTagName |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
querySelectorAll | 1369676.1 Ops/sec |
getElementsByTagName | 2054919.2 Ops/sec |
Let's dive into the explanation of the provided benchmark.
Benchmark Overview
The benchmark is designed to compare the performance of two JavaScript methods for selecting elements from an HTML document: querySelectorAll
and getElementsByTagName
. The test creates multiple <div>
elements in an HTML string, which serves as the input data for these selection methods.
Options Compared
Two options are being compared:
Pros and Cons
querySelectorAll
has several advantages:getElementsByTagName
, as it allows selecting elements based on a CSS selector (e.g., div > p
).getElementsByTagName
.querySelectorAll
has some limitations:On the other hand, getElementsByTagName
is simpler and more widely supported:
querySelectorAll
.Library
None are used in this benchmark. The methods being compared are built-in JavaScript methods.
Special JS Feature/Syntax
There is no special feature or syntax being tested in this benchmark. However, the use of CSS selectors (in querySelectorAll
) assumes a modern browser that supports them.
Other Alternatives
If you need to select elements in older browsers or require more advanced selection capabilities, consider using:
querySelector
: This method is similar to querySelectorAll
, but returns only the first matching element.getElementsByClassName
, getElementsByAttribute
, and other DOM methods: These can be used for more specific selections.Keep in mind that browser support and performance may vary depending on the alternative method chosen.