<script src='https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/lodash.js/4.17.5/lodash.min.js'></script>
var a = null;
var b = undefined;
var c = NaN;
var d = false;
var e = 'a';
var f = 0;
var g = {};
_.isNil(a);
_.isNil(b);
_.isNil(c);
_.isNil(d);
_.isNil(e);
_.isNil(f);
_.isNil(g)
function isNil(value){
return !value;
}
isNil(a);
isNil(b);
isNil(c);
isNil(d);
isNil(e);
isNil(f);
isNil(g);
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
lodash isNil | |
! Operator |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
lodash isNil | 1551564.5 Ops/sec |
! Operator | 4886040.5 Ops/sec |
Overview
The provided JSON represents a JavaScript benchmark test case on MeasureThat.net, where the goal is to compare the performance of two approaches: using the Lodash library's isNil
function and the unary negation operator (!
) in isolation.
Benchmark Test Case
The test case involves creating an array of variables with different values (null, undefined, NaN, false, string, number, object) and then calling the isNil
function on each variable using both approaches:
isNil
: The test uses the Lodash library's isNil
function to check if a value is null or undefined.!
): The test defines a custom isNil
function that simply returns the negation of the input value.Options Compared
The benchmark compares the performance of two options:
isNil
: Using the Lodash library to perform null checks.!
): Using a simple custom function with a unary negation operator to check for null or undefined values.Pros and Cons
isNil
Pros:
isNil
function, which can be relied upon for accuracy.Cons:
!
)Pros:
Cons:
isNil
.Library: Lodash
Lodash is a popular JavaScript utility library that provides various functions for tasks such as array manipulation, object manipulation, and more. The isNil
function is one of its core utility functions, designed to check if a value is null or undefined.
In this benchmark, the Lodash library's isNil
function is used to provide a baseline comparison for the unary negation operator (!
). By using an external library, the test ensures that any performance differences can be attributed to the specific implementation rather than the framework or environment.
Special JS Feature/Syntax: None
There are no special JavaScript features or syntax used in this benchmark. The focus is on comparing two simple implementations for null checks.
Other Alternatives
Other alternatives for null checking could include:
typeof
check with null
and undefined
x !== x
)?.
) or Nullish Coalescing (??
)However, these alternatives may not be as straightforward to implement or may have different performance characteristics compared to the Lodash library's isNil
.