var other = [ "hello", true, 7 ].concat([ 1, 2, 3]);
var other = [ [ "hello", true, 7 ], [ 1, 2, 3] ]
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
slice | |
spread operator |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
slice | 17007744.0 Ops/sec |
spread operator | 44220176.0 Ops/sec |
Let's break down the provided benchmark and explain what's being tested.
Benchmark Overview
The test is comparing two approaches to concatenate arrays in JavaScript:
concat()
method....
).Options Compared
In this benchmark, we have two options:
concat()
method: This approach uses the built-in concat()
function to merge two arrays....
) to merge two arrays.Pros and Cons of Each Approach
Traditional concat()
Method:
Pros:
Cons:
Spread Operator (...
):
Pros:
concat()
.Cons:
Library and Special JS Feature
In this benchmark, we don't see any libraries being used. However, the use of the spread operator is a special JavaScript feature introduced in ECMAScript 2015 (ES6).
Other Considerations
When choosing between these two approaches, consider the following:
Alternative Approaches
Other alternatives for concatenating arrays in JavaScript include:
Array.prototype.push()
: This approach uses the push()
method to add elements to an array, but it's less efficient than the spread operator.Array.prototype.splice()
: This approach uses the splice()
method to remove and replace elements in an array, which can be slower and more memory-intensive than the spread operator.Overall, the choice between the traditional concat()
method and the spread operator depends on your specific use case, performance requirements, and target browser support.