<select id="container"></select>
var node = document.getElementById('container');
for(var i = 0; i < 3; i++) {
var option = document.createElement('option');
option.value = "Some text"
node.appendChild(option);
}
var node = document.getElementById('container');
node.innerHTML = '';
var node = document.getElementById('container');
while(node.firstChild) node.removeChild(node.firstChild)
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
innerHTML | |
removeChild |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
innerHTML | 154615.9 Ops/sec |
removeChild | 1109115.4 Ops/sec |
The provided JSON represents a benchmark test case for measuring the performance difference between two approaches: setting the innerHTML
property of an HTML element versus removing all child nodes using the removeChild
method.
Benchmark Definition
In this test, the script preparation code creates a container select element and appends three options to it. The HTML preparation code only defines the container select element.
Options Compared
The two options being compared are:
innerHTML
property of the container element.Pros and Cons
Library Usage
In this test, no external libraries are used.
Special JS Feature/Syntax
There is no special JavaScript feature or syntax being tested in this benchmark. The focus is solely on comparing the performance of two different DOM manipulation approaches.
Other Alternatives
Other alternatives to these two approaches could include:
html()
method, which can be faster than setting innerHTML directly.It's worth noting that the performance difference between these two approaches may depend on various factors, such as the specific use case, the size and complexity of the innerHTML value, and the target browser or platform.