var params = [ "hello", true, 7 ];
var other = [ 1, 2 ].concat(params);
var params = [ "hello", true, 7 ]
var other = [ 1, 2, params ]
var params = [ "hello", true, 7 ];
var other = $.merge([1, 2], params);
var params = [ "hello", true, 7 ];
var arr = [ 1, 2 ];
var other = arr.push(params);
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
Array.prototype.concat | |
spread operator | |
jQuery merge | |
test |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
Array.prototype.concat | 5955250.0 Ops/sec |
spread operator | 5062332.5 Ops/sec |
jQuery merge | 1834189.8 Ops/sec |
test | 4718246.0 Ops/sec |
Let's break down the provided benchmark and explain what's being tested.
Benchmark Overview
The benchmark compares three approaches to concatenate an array with another array:
Array.prototype.concat()
...
)$.merge()
function (for older browsers that don't support the spread operator)push(...)
methodOptions Compared
The benchmark compares the performance of these four approaches:
Array.prototype.concat()
: a traditional method for concatenating arrays...
): a concise way to concatenate arrays using the spread syntax$.merge()
function: an older method for merging arrays, supported by jQuery but not native JavaScriptpush(...)
method: a straightforward way to append elements to an arrayPros and Cons of Each Approach
Here's a brief summary:
Array.prototype.concat()
: reliable, widely supported, but can be slower than other methods due to the overhead of calling a method on the prototype....
): concise, efficient, and widely supported in modern browsers. However, it may not work in older browsers or environments that don't support it.$.merge()
function: an older method that works in some cases but can be slower than other methods due to the overhead of calling a method on the prototype. It's mostly deprecated in favor of native JavaScript methods.push(...)
method: straightforward, efficient, and widely supported. However, it may not be as concise or readable as other methods.Library Usage
In this benchmark, jQuery is used for its $.merge()
function, which is a legacy method that was popular before the spread operator became widely adopted. This suggests that the benchmark is targeting older browsers or environments where jQuery is still relevant.
Special JS Features or Syntax
There are no special JavaScript features or syntaxes mentioned in this benchmark. The focus is on comparing different methods for concatenating arrays, which is a fundamental operation in JavaScript programming.
Other Alternatives
If you're interested in exploring alternative approaches to array concatenation, here are some options:
Array.prototype.push()
with the spread operator (...
): e.g., arr.push(...params)
Keep in mind that these alternatives may have trade-offs in terms of performance, readability, and compatibility with different browsers and environments.