var str = "";
var i;
var sArr = [];
for (i = 1000; i > 0; i--) {
sArr[i] = i;
}
var sArr = [];
for (i = 1000; i > 0; i--) {
sArr.push(i);
}
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
by index | |
by push |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
by index | 217964.9 Ops/sec |
by push | 133602.6 Ops/sec |
Let's dive into the world of MeasureThat.net and explore what's being tested in this benchmark.
Overview
MeasureThat.net is a website that allows users to create and run JavaScript microbenchmarks. The provided JSON data represents two test cases, each designed to measure the performance difference between two approaches: accessing array elements by index versus using the push
method.
Benchmark Definitions
The benchmark definitions are represented as strings of JavaScript code. There are two test cases:
var sArr = [];
for (i = 1000; i > 0; i--) {
sArr[i] = i;
}
This code creates an array sArr
and populates it with values from 1000 to 1, assigning each value to a specific index in the array.
var sArr = [];
for (i = 1000; i > 0; i--) {
sArr.push(i);
}
This code creates an array sArr
and pushes values from 1000 to 1 onto the end of the array, without explicitly assigning them to specific indices.
Options Compared
The two test cases compare the performance difference between accessing array elements by index (using sArr[i]
) versus using the push
method (using sArr.push(i)
).
Pros and Cons
Accessing Array Elements by Index:
Pros:
Cons:
Using push
Method:
Pros:
Cons:
Library and Syntax Considerations
Neither test case uses any specific libraries or syntax features beyond standard JavaScript. However, it's worth noting that the use of for
loops with explicit indexing can be less common in modern JavaScript development, where array methods like forEach
, map
, and filter
are often preferred.
Other Alternatives
If you want to explore alternative approaches for accessing or manipulating arrays, here are a few options:
push
method, consider using array methods like forEach
, map
, or filter
. These can be more concise and expressive but may have different performance characteristics.Array.prototype[Symbol.iterator]
) to iterate over the array elements without accessing them directly. This approach can provide better control over iteration but might require additional setup.Int32Array
or Float64Array
for specific types of data, which can provide better performance and memory efficiency.Keep in mind that these alternatives may have different implications for readability, maintainability, and performance, so choose the approach that best fits your use case and requirements.