Benchmark: ,mcv,bmcvbm - MeasureThat.net

Tests:

assign
let cookies = Math.random() < 0.5 ? "sdfsdfsdfsddf" : ""; let headers = Object.assign({}, cookies ? { Cookie: cookies } : {});
object
let cookies = Math.random() < 0.5 ? "sdfsdfsdfsddf" : ""; let headers = cookies ? { Cookie: cookies } : {};

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
assign
object

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one month ago):

LLMs can make mistakes. Check important info.

Let's break down the provided JSON benchmark data.

**Benchmark Definition and Test Cases**

The benchmark definition is represented by the "Benchmark Definition" field in each individual test case, which is a JavaScript code snippet that defines a simple variable `cookies` based on a random condition. The two test cases are:

1. **assign**: This test case creates an object with a `Cookie` property using the `Object.assign()` method.
2. **object**: This test case creates an object with a `Cookie` property, but without using the `Object.assign()` method.

**Options Compared**

In both test cases, two approaches are being compared:

1. Using `Object.assign()` to create an object with a nested property (`assign` test case).
2. Creating an object directly with curly braces and the property name as key (`object` test case).

**Pros and Cons of Each Approach**

* **Using `Object.assign()`**:
	+ Pros: Can be more concise and readable, as it eliminates the need to explicitly specify the property name.
	+ Cons: May have performance implications due to the overhead of function calls and object creation.
* **Creating an object directly with curly braces**:
	+ Pros: Can be faster and more efficient, as it avoids the overhead of function calls and object creation.
	+ Cons: May require more code and make the syntax less readable.

**Other Considerations**

* The `cookies` variable is created using a random condition to determine its value. This might help mask any performance differences between the two approaches.
* Both test cases use strict equality checks (`===`) when assigning values to the `Cookie` property, which ensures that only the specified value is used.

**Libraries and Special JS Features**

There are no libraries explicitly mentioned in the benchmark definition or individual test cases. However, `Object.assign()` is a built-in JavaScript method that is part of the ECMAScript standard.

**Special JS Feature**

The only special JavaScript feature mentioned is the use of strict equality checks (`===`) in both test cases. This is not particularly noteworthy, but it's an example of how developers can use specific language features to improve code quality and readability.

**Alternatives**

If you were to create a similar benchmark, you might consider adding additional test cases or variations to explore other aspects of JavaScript performance, such as:

* Using different data types (e.g., strings, numbers) for the `cookies` variable
* Adding more complex logic or conditional statements to the benchmark definition
* Testing with different browser versions or platforms
* Exploring the impact of JavaScript engine optimizations (e.g., V8, SpiderMonkey)

Keep in mind that the specific test cases and variations will depend on your goals and interests.

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: 2 years ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:101.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/101.0

Browser/OS: Firefox 101 on Linux

View result in a separate tab

Test name	Executions per second
assign	18341380.0 Ops/sec
object	129547608.0 Ops/sec

Related benchmarks:

,mcv,bmcvbm (version: 0)

Comparing performance of: assign vs object

Created: 2 years ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

assign

object

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Experimental features:

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one month ago):